The sensor does not decide the format. The link does.

Uncompressed video has exactly one rate and it is a product of four numbers: width × height × bits-per-pixel ÷ 8 × frames per second. There is no quality term in that line and nothing else in it either. 1920 × 1080 at 30 fps in yuy2 is 995.3 Mbps, and it is that whether the picture is a test card or a wedding.

The engine is free and needs no account. And the number on the link is not the number a camera gets: USB 2.0 signals at 480 Mbps, but a camera reserves an isochronous endpoint and the specification caps one at 1024 bytes × 3 transactions per 125 µs microframe — 3,072 × 8,000 = 196.6 Mbps, or 24.6 MB/s. That is 41% of the number on the box and no cable, driver or controller changes it. So 1080p30 uncompressed is 5.06x what a USB 2.0 camera can ever have, and the frame rate it would actually manage is 5.93 fps. The three ways out are all divisions — half the frame rate is 2x, 4:2:2 to 4:2:0 is 1.33x and changes neither the size nor the motion, and halving each side is 4x, because area goes as the square of the scale. A hub is not a multiplier: everything downstream of one competes for the same reservation, which is why the second camera drops the moment it is plugged in. And a memory format is not a wire format — v210 pads by 6.67%, which is exactly the difference between fitting a 3G-SDI link and not. Every lane ships a worked example that costs nothing. Writing the report needs credits.